Skip to main content

Did Evolution Undermine Motherhood—or Are We Simply Expecting Too Much from Mothers?

There’s an old saying that, 50 years ago, babies in South India would take 40 days to open their eyes—while today, they open them within minutes. Similarly, people used to believe that breastfeeding worked as a natural family planning method for up to five years about a century ago, but now, they say evolution has overridden that too.

Along those lines, I wonder—has evolution diminished motherhood itself, or have we simply misunderstood and overburdened it?

Although I don’t actively follow the news much these days, I still come across troubling stories—particularly from Tamil Nadu—where mothers have harmed or even killed their own children. In one viral video, a husband explains how his wife, addicted to Instagram reels, finds it too inconvenient to feed their child and calls him during work hours to do it instead.

It raises a disturbing question: Are some Tamil mothers starting to see their own children as burdens—or is it the act of caregiving that feels burdensome? Perhaps both. Addictions like gossip, social media validation, and the urge to show off are playing a growing role, enabled by smartphones and social platforms.

But maybe we’ve also misunderstood the concept of motherhood itself—especially in Tamil society. Not long ago, the traditional Tamil family was often a joint family, where the responsibility of child-rearing didn’t fall solely on the mother. Someone else in the extended family—often a less privileged member—would take on that role.

When society transitioned from joint families to nuclear ones, the change was gradual. Initially, it was still a nuclear family plus grandparents. During that period, much of the childcare burden fell on the grandparents. But when even they found it hard to manage, the system transitioned to fully nuclear families—with no one left to shoulder the responsibility. In the end, the children are left without adequate care.

There’s also another layer to consider. I feel that, biologically or socially, women might not feel the same level of urgency or pressure to support the family as men do. Some may argue that women work too—and yes, they do. But when men earn, it often comes with hurdles, emotional strain, and even humiliation—especially in the workplace. They endure all this not for pride or pleasure, but out of sheer responsibility for their families, particularly their children. In contrast, many working women today face fewer obstacles or social pressures in their jobs, and often earn money in ways that feel more accessible or less punishing. As a result, they may not always see their income as a sacrifice, nor feel the same emotional weight behind it. In that sense, what we traditionally called “motherhood”—a selfless, often invisible form of dedication—is increasingly showing up in modern fatherhood. So perhaps, fatherhood is becoming the new motherhood.



Disclosure:

The following ChatGPT prompt is used in this blog post:

Please fix the language of the below text and highlight the changes in bold:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Save American College, Madurai

This post was written in 2008 and outdated now. For update, please check Save American College, Madurai (Update 2011) Update (2011-01-16) : Save American College, Madurai (Update 2011) I'm highly privileged to have 3 degrees (B.Sc. (Spl. Physics), PGDCA and MCA) from The American College, Madurai, South India . Unlike other "commercial" colleges, American College has given room for poor students and uplifted them. And unlike other "elite" colleges who'd give seat only for "intellectuals", American College has produced geniuses. In the recent months, the saddening thing is that the college is under divide (Principal Vs. Bishop). Here is the email I sent to alumnae lately informing about the informations that I received about the developments: Update (2011-01-16) : Save American College, Madurai (Update 2011) All: I was thinking that the " Save American College " campaign was a FUD . But, when I tried to understand the problem through my...

BehaviorS.js - An alternative to Behaviour.js, event:Selectors and Low Pro libs for unobtrusive JavaScript programming

BehaviorS.js yet another unobtrusive JavaScript library similar to Behaviour.js and event:Selectors but in implementation uses hash based lookup without extending elements; so presumably it should be faster than the rest. The original script and idea was by JLof ; I extended it for DOMContentLoaded support, optimized a bit to avoid scanning of more depths, and added new rules support. I wanted to document the plug a long time and just got time to do it. For the time being BehaviorS.js is available here Update (2006-09-11) : Coralized the link to BehaviorS.js so as to save the load on free brinkster.com webpage Update (2006-09-27) : If the coralized link to BehaviorS.js doesn't work, use http://www21.brinkster.com/guideme/BehaviorS/ Update (2025-06-07) : Now available in https://github.com/rrjanbiah/behaviorsjs

Interview question #1

Since I have been asked to interview experienced PHP programmers, I was preparing few interview questions. I came to know, most of the people ask questions found in the Internet; most of them are like "What is the function used to connect MySQL DB in PHP". Personally, I don't like these types of questions; I'd thought the person must apply ideas what he was taught in colleges--finally I came out with one question: A product vendor has Quantity Vs. Price data like 1 -> Rs. 50 2 -> Rs. 95 3 -> Rs. 140 .... like upto 1 million data. He wants a system, which gives the price when the quantity is provided. For example, if you provide the quantity value as 2, then it should provide Rs. 95. How this system can be designed? As expected, all the people said about using database tables and quering on quantity. I have asked them to find out a system which doesn't use databases--provided the accuracy of the system may not be 100%--it may give at least 90% ac...