Skip to main content

Did Evolution Undermine Motherhood—or Are We Simply Expecting Too Much from Mothers?

There’s an old saying that, 50 years ago, babies in South India would take 40 days to open their eyes—while today, they open them within minutes. Similarly, people used to believe that breastfeeding worked as a natural family planning method for up to five years about a century ago, but now, they say evolution has overridden that too.

Along those lines, I wonder—has evolution diminished motherhood itself, or have we simply misunderstood and overburdened it?

Although I don’t actively follow the news much these days, I still come across troubling stories—particularly from Tamil Nadu—where mothers have harmed or even killed their own children. In one viral video, a husband explains how his wife, addicted to Instagram reels, finds it too inconvenient to feed their child and calls him during work hours to do it instead.

It raises a disturbing question: Are some Tamil mothers starting to see their own children as burdens—or is it the act of caregiving that feels burdensome? Perhaps both. Addictions like gossip, social media validation, and the urge to show off are playing a growing role, enabled by smartphones and social platforms.

But maybe we’ve also misunderstood the concept of motherhood itself—especially in Tamil society. Not long ago, the traditional Tamil family was often a joint family, where the responsibility of child-rearing didn’t fall solely on the mother. Someone else in the extended family—often a less privileged member—would take on that role.

When society transitioned from joint families to nuclear ones, the change was gradual. Initially, it was still a nuclear family plus grandparents. During that period, much of the childcare burden fell on the grandparents. But when even they found it hard to manage, the system transitioned to fully nuclear families—with no one left to shoulder the responsibility. In the end, the children are left without adequate care.

There’s also another layer to consider. I feel that, biologically or socially, women might not feel the same level of urgency or pressure to support the family as men do. Some may argue that women work too—and yes, they do. But when men earn, it often comes with hurdles, emotional strain, and even humiliation—especially in the workplace. They endure all this not for pride or pleasure, but out of sheer responsibility for their families, particularly their children. In contrast, many working women today face fewer obstacles or social pressures in their jobs, and often earn money in ways that feel more accessible or less punishing. As a result, they may not always see their income as a sacrifice, nor feel the same emotional weight behind it. In that sense, what we traditionally called “motherhood”—a selfless, often invisible form of dedication—is increasingly showing up in modern fatherhood. So perhaps, fatherhood is becoming the new motherhood.



Disclosure:

The following ChatGPT prompt is used in this blog post:

Please fix the language of the below text and highlight the changes in bold:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open source PHP frameworks and problems

I was using CakePHP for sometime and proposed CakePlus , another UIMS toolkit on the top of CakePHP but also altering some problematic core of it. The thread should explain the outcome of the post. And, then I noted Akelos framework has most of the things built in. Issues with frameworks esp. CakePHP Scalability not a priority - Developers aren't aware that we can't throw more and more hardware Excessive use of regular expressions Evangelist isn't aware that the framework throws many queries unnecessarily More memory consumption - 100M would never be enough for a simple project Poor coding standards and practices - Prolong use of extract() often leads to more memory consumption Can't use the native approaches or baked codes. The override approach always lead to hard to debug codes Poor architected codes and no clear defined approaches. People belong to the cult drives the direction and often throws unprofiled codes. No native provision to share codes between M-V-C and...

Solved: "Ports" Tab Not Visible in VS Code (WSL2)

None of the solutions I found on Reddit or GitHub worked, and most of the related GitHub issues were locked. So I'm documenting this here for future reference. Problem When using WSL2 in Visual Studio Code, the Ports tab—needed to access your application in Windows browsers like Chrome or Edge—doesn't appear. Even the Ports-related options are missing from the Command Palette. Solution After a lot of trial and error, here's what worked: Run npx serve in the VS Code terminal. It will output a URL such as http://localhost:3000/ . Click the link (or use the Follow Link option). This will open the app in your default browser. You may notice that it opens on a different port (for example, http://localhost:64198 ). At this point, the Ports tab becomes available in VS Code. After this initial trigger, the Ports tab seems to remain available in future VS Code...

Interview question #1

Since I have been asked to interview experienced PHP programmers, I was preparing few interview questions. I came to know, most of the people ask questions found in the Internet; most of them are like "What is the function used to connect MySQL DB in PHP". Personally, I don't like these types of questions; I'd thought the person must apply ideas what he was taught in colleges--finally I came out with one question: A product vendor has Quantity Vs. Price data like 1 -> Rs. 50 2 -> Rs. 95 3 -> Rs. 140 .... like upto 1 million data. He wants a system, which gives the price when the quantity is provided. For example, if you provide the quantity value as 2, then it should provide Rs. 95. How this system can be designed? As expected, all the people said about using database tables and quering on quantity. I have asked them to find out a system which doesn't use databases--provided the accuracy of the system may not be 100%--it may give at least 90% ac...