Skip to main content

Save Perarivalan, killer of Rajiv Gandhi (?!)

Perarivalan's MCA degree has drawn my attention on his case. I thought of digging little deeper on this. He is one of the convicted persons on Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, sentenced to death/capital punishment.

Perarivalan's Judgment

Search for "Arivu" (Perarivalan's alias) on the final judgment by Supreme Court titled "State Of Tamil Nadu Through ... vs Nalini And 25 Others on 11 May, 1999" and then compare the judgment of any acquitted person on the list. It seems that all are weighted equally on the case, but Perarivalan's got death sentence.

I then searched over and found a Tamil blog dated January 7, 2007 where he explains his case as "Rejected Justice". English version of his text/book is available in slideshow format "An Appeal from The Death Row"

Possible reasons for his innocence

After reading judgment file and his blog/book, it all looks like:
  • He's a guy with DK and LTTE propaganda. (DK seems to have sidelined him.)
  • If he does really belong to core LTTE execution team, he may not have the fear of death (he might have preferred suicide before getting caught by police).
  • The battery that he has bought may or may not be used in the bomb, as the bomb manufacturer is still not detected or investigated.
  • He doesn't seem to be aware of the conspiracy at all.
  • Much important legal point is that, though the Supreme Court has clearly held that the TADA act cannot apply to the Rajiv Gandhi murder case, the verdict was based on the confessional statements recorded under TADA. TADA act denies the opportunity to appeal in court. In his book, he mentions the reason for signing the confessional statement and how he wasn’t given chance to explain in court: After signing under severe torture I was forced to get in to the horrible prison room and I simply wept there. The guard there on duty asked me, "why are you weeping ?" I explained everything to him. Then he consoled, "the signature in police custody is not valid in Court. Hence whatever had been written in the document will not affect you". I believed his statement. He uttered those words with human love. There is truth in his statement. He made the statement on the basis of his familiarity with normal legal procedures. But the tragedy is that he did not know anything about TADA.

    I did not know TADA. I did not know the significance of confessional statements. I did not know the legal consequence of confessional statement. Still I signed because I was forced to sign.

Anti-Justice politics?

As usual, some people are making politics out of this death sentence and showing their intelligence. If Perarivalan is really innocent, is this politics against justice or?

Also, everywhere in the internet, many want the killers to be hanged. There shouldn't be any doubt on that; but what about hanging innocent people? Didn't they aware Perarivalan's cry for justice?

Need of the hour

  • Perarivalan's English book/text has to be made available in plaintext or HTML format to be picked up search engines (Current format is not search engine friendly) to get social media attention.
  • The case has to be relooked further; if any judgment is passed again, it must be convincible enough.
  • Yet another cry for justice--by everyone.

Update September 5, 2011


Update November 28, 2011

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Problems with CakePHP - follow-up

Some people have responded including the Datepicker fame Marc Grabanski . So, this follow-up... First of all, I was not ranting nor complaining; I've just blogged/documented my experience. The common problem most of the people pointed out are that it scales for addons.mozilla.com. Those who have accessed their source code can understand that they've done lot of things and also the site is not database-intensive. You should really create a real database-intensive website to understand what I mean. The other point that been pointed out is about open source and community. Lot of people may not be knowing that it's 2 people pushing it and don't want others to be credited . The generic model or dynamic model idea was originally been from grigri and Marcel . It's hard to be called as open source as only few and sycophants are driving it's direction (I'm not talking about svn access) So, here are my humble checklist before you start shouting at me Did you read a

BehaviorS.js - An alternative to Behaviour.js, event:Selectors and Low Pro libs for unobtrusive JavaScript programming

BehaviorS.js yet another unobtrusive JavaScript library similar to Behaviour.js and event:Selectors but in implementation uses hash based lookup without extending elements; so presumably it should be faster than the rest. The original script and idea was by JLof ; I extended it for DOMContentLoaded support, optimized a bit to avoid scanning of more depths, and added new rules support. I wanted to document the plug a long time and just got time to do it. For the time being BehaviorS.js is available here Update (2006-09-11) : Coralized the link to BehaviorS.js so as to save the load on free brinkster.com webpage Update (2006-09-27) : If the coralized link to BehaviorS.js doesn't work, use http://www21.brinkster.com/guideme/BehaviorS/

Open source PHP frameworks and problems

I was using CakePHP for sometime and proposed CakePlus , another UIMS toolkit on the top of CakePHP but also altering some problematic core of it. The thread should explain the outcome of the post. And, then I noted Akelos framework has most of the things built in. Issues with frameworks esp. CakePHP Scalability not a priority - Developers aren't aware that we can't throw more and more hardware Excessive use of regular expressions Evangelist isn't aware that the framework throws many queries unnecessarily More memory consumption - 100M would never be enough for a simple project Poor coding standards and practices - Prolong use of extract() often leads to more memory consumption Can't use the native approaches or baked codes. The override approach always lead to hard to debug codes Poor architected codes and no clear defined approaches. People belong to the cult drives the direction and often throws unprofiled codes. No native provision to share codes between M-V-C and