Perarivalan's JudgmentSearch for "Arivu" (Perarivalan's alias) on the final judgment by Supreme Court titled "State Of Tamil Nadu Through ... vs Nalini And 25 Others on 11 May, 1999" and then compare the judgment of any acquitted person on the list. It seems that all are weighted equally on the case, but Perarivalan's got death sentence.
I then searched over and found a Tamil blog dated January 7, 2007 where he explains his case as "Rejected Justice". English version of his text/book is available in slideshow format "An Appeal from The Death Row"
Possible reasons for his innocenceAfter reading judgment file and his blog/book, it all looks like:
- He's a guy with DK and LTTE propaganda. (DK seems to have sidelined him.)
- If he does really belong to core LTTE execution team, he may not have the fear of death (he might have preferred suicide before getting caught by police).
- The battery that he has bought may or may not be used in the bomb, as the bomb manufacturer is still not detected or investigated.
- He doesn't seem to be aware of the conspiracy at all.
- Much important legal point is that, though the Supreme Court has clearly held that the TADA act cannot apply to the Rajiv Gandhi murder case, the verdict was based on the confessional statements recorded under TADA. TADA act denies the opportunity to appeal in court. In his book, he mentions the reason for signing the confessional statement and how he wasn’t given chance to explain in court: After signing under severe torture I was forced to get in to the horrible prison room and I simply wept there. The guard there on duty asked me, "why are you weeping ?" I explained everything to him. Then he consoled, "the signature in police custody is not valid in Court. Hence whatever had been written in the document will not affect you". I believed his statement. He uttered those words with human love. There is truth in his statement. He made the statement on the basis of his familiarity with normal legal procedures. But the tragedy is that he did not know anything about TADA.
I did not know TADA. I did not know the significance of confessional statements. I did not know the legal consequence of confessional statement. Still I signed because I was forced to sign.
Anti-Justice politics?As usual, Arnab Goswami, Subramanian Swamy and Cho Ramaswamy are making politics out of this death sentence and showing their intelligence. If Perarivalan is really innocent, is this politics against justice or? The most pathetic thing is that these intellectuals sideline Nedumaran who once saved Indira Gandhi.
Also, everywhere in the internet, non-Tamils want the killers to be hanged. There shouldn't be any doubt on that; but what about hanging innocent people? Didn't they aware Perarivalan's cry for justice?
Need of the hour
Perarivalan's English book/text has to be made available in plaintext or HTML format to be picked up search engines (Current format is not search engine friendly) to get social media attention.
- The case has to be relooked further; if any judgment is passed again, it must be convincible enough.
- Yet another cry for justice--by everyone.
Update September 5, 2011
- I have found the book An Appeal from The Death Row (Rajiv Murder Case - The Truth Speaks) in search engine friendly format (PDF)
- Hon. Justice Krishna Iyer's letter of appeal to Tamilnadu CM on August 29, 2011 in which he quotes Sonia Gandhi as she already offered mercy for them